Summary: Inspection of Lead Aprons: A Practical Rejection Model
This is a summary of the study “Inspection of Lead Aprons: A Practical Rejection Model” by W. Stam and M. Pillay. To read the full study, click here.
Purpose
The study aims to propose a practical model for evaluating defects in lead aprons on a routine basis. The focus is on maintaining the annual radiation dose received by hospital personnel wearing lead aprons as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA).
Summary
Over time, lead aprons and thyroid shields may develop defects, especially tears, potentially increasing the radiation dose to the wearer. The study introduces a model for assessing defects based on the concept of additional dose, which is the dose exceeding the expected level due to a tear in the apron. The model considers factors such as lead equivalence, tear size, and exposure geometry. Practical rejection criteria are established to guide periodic inspections, aiming to ensure radiation safety and adherence to ALARA principles.
Lead aprons in medical facilities are generally inspected annually, with an additional half-yearly inspection for those with marginal defects. A 10-month follow-up on aprons with small defects showed an average tear increase of over 270%. In a facility with 96 inspected lead aprons, 3.1% were found to have defects resulting in unacceptable additional doses. Comparisons with another facility suggest that proposed rejection criteria do not lead to excessive rejection.
RCS Recommendation
The study suggests an annual inspection of lead aprons, emphasizing the importance of identifying and addressing defects promptly. Additionally, a semi-annual inspection is recommended for aprons with marginal defects to monitor potential progression.
The proposed rejection criteria, based on an additional effective dose of 0.22 mSv, provide a practical guide for determining the maximum tolerable tear length. The study encourages a balance between economic considerations and safety, advocating for proper handling and storage of lead aprons.
The rejection criteria, aligned with ALARA principles, serve as a valuable tool for quality assurance programs in medical facilities.